Search Results for: wiki storming

feminist wiki-storming

Why Teach with Wikipedia?

There are a number of ways that having students work on Wikipedia pages as part of a class can support educational goals. It offers a chance for research and writing to be experienced as a collaborative enterprise as well as an individual activity. It deepens students’ understanding of social media, and it helps them to become more critical thinkers as they engage with the Wikipedia community and its evolving values. It offers them a chance to be an active part of knowledge dissemination and the ongoing public conversation over what constitutes knowledge. Perhaps most crucially, it allows students to take the research and writing process all the way to the publication stage, something that is not normally possible within a single quarter or semester. The awareness that their pages will be visible to a worldwide audience—and that their entries are likely to be critiqued in various ways by the Wikipedia community of editors— tends to raise the bar for student achievement. To date, Wikipedia editing has been successfully integrated into a wide range of fields, from English to Science & Technology Studies to Art.

What can Teaching with Wikipedia Offer Classes about Feminism?

Feminists Engage Wikipedia LogoFaculty teaching courses about feminism, or that touch on feminist issues, find that having students engage with Wikipedia can develop their critical awareness in several ways. Fruitful discussions of gender bias (as well as other forms of bias) can develop from close analysis of Wikipedia entries, subject areas, and taxonomies, as well as patterns of language use and social interaction on the site. Students who take the responsibility to create or edit Wikipedia pages where shortcomings have been identified make the crucial step from observer to shaper of the public discourse.

What Kinds of Wikipedia Assignments are There?

One common approach is to have students add missing items to Wikipedia, such as biographies of notable women or topical entries related to gender or feminism in some way. While we see the need for traditional Wikipedia assignments that focus on adding such content to Wikipedia, we also want to encourage professors to develop assignments that encourage students to learn about the processes on Wikipedia that are responsible for perpetuating some of the gender bias inherent in traditional encyclopedias and culture at large. Please see below for approaches to creating assignments and links to existing assignment examples.

Wikistorming Learning Objectives

In summary, among the possible learning objectives for Wikistorming assignments and projects are the following:

  • Students learn to write for diverse, global audiences
  • Students learn information literacy for the digital age
  • Students develop the research and writing skills to contribute to the world’s largest encyclopedia
  • Students contribute to the effort to create a more equitable, inviting knowledge-space
  • Students learn about how knowledge is produced and consumed, becoming better critical thinkers
  • Students become an integral part of a knowledge-building community
  • Students learn about engaging in principled intellectual discussion in the public sphere
  • Students gain skills in collaborative writing

Approaches to Teaching with Wikipedia

There are a plethora of ways that one might teach with Wikipedia. Below are a couple of starting points, which are by no means exhaustive. We have offered more details on kinds of assignments that the Wikistorming Committee has discussed or that have been taught by other FemTechNet members in the Sample Wikipedia Assignments page.

  • Developing critical readings and understanding the topics/issues/people for which Wikipedia articles exist   While Wikipedia is much larger than any previous encyclopedia because it is not limited by the printed page, not every topic has an article and many are excluded. Wikipedia has a “notability” threshold that topics must reach to be included. Understanding the complex criteria that make up this policy and the debates that surround it is a key part of understanding Wikipedia.
  • Identifying areas for new article creation or article expansion  Once students have a sense of the notability threshold, they can identify areas in which to propose new articles or expand existing content. This process might also include discussions of what doesn’t rise to the level of notable and a critical appraisal of how that impacts content and what kinds of dependencies within the resource are thereby suggested.
  • Survey existing debates to understand how the editorial community works  The editorial community of Wikipedia consists of many different kinds of editors and there are robust conversations regarding the structure, processes, and content of Wikipedia. Introduce students to the concept of the “Talk Page” and then encourage them to learn from discussions and participate.
  • Participate in the content creation  One of the best ways to understand how Wikipedia works is to participate in content creation. This can range from small scale editing to the creation of articles or projects. See the sample assignments for ideas on how to get started.
  • Participate in the peer review process  Wikipedia depends not only on the work of editors for content creation, but also for peer review of existing articles and support of other editors. Students can join in this critical review process.

Creating Assignments

There are a number of ways to approach developing assignments and events for Wikistorming efforts. Whatever you choose, we recommend that you consult someone who has done such an assignment or event before and/or poke around on Wikipedia yourself so that you have a good sense of the possible areas of confusion and pitfalls. The Wikipedia Education Program has Campus Ambassadors and Online Ambassadors that can help you with your classes and Wikipedia:GLAM can help you if you are working on events with cultural institutions. Please also see more information on Types of Wikipedia Work from FemTechNet.

Example of Five Wikistorming Projects

For the Fall of 2013, DOCC professors and students worked on the following five projects:

  • Adding feminist scholarship to already existing content on Wikipedia
  • Creating and expanding articles on women who played and are playing important roles in history and current events
  • Making Wikipedia readers and editors more aware of the systemic gender bias inherent in the encyclopedia’s structure
  • Encouraging feminists, academics, and activists to contribute to Wikipedia and help revolutionize its culture
  • Participating in Wikipedia’s processes

By adding articles and information about women and feminist scholarship, we are making certain women and their contributions to culture are remembered and acknowledged in the digital landscape. By becoming contributors to Wikipedia, we are helping change the demographics of Wikipedia’s editor-base in order to create a more equitable, inviting space.  These projects emphasize the collaborative nature of both Wikipedia and feminist projects – they do not have to be ones in which a professor dictates all of the rules and then gives a grade. We want to encourage professors and students to learn together, contribute together, and become part of the larger Wikipedia community. As such, we have created a hub of activity at WikiProject Feminism on Wikipedia, an open tasks list, that lists article related to these goals very broadly. If you are looking for areas to contribute, this is a good place to start.

Sample assignments developed by instructors who are already working with Wikipedia in their classes are linked below.

Resources

From Members of FemTechNet:

Essential Wikipedia Resources:

From the FemTechNet Vimeo Channel:

Wikistorming in Progress

By Adrianne Wadewitz

For the past two months, students in DOCC’s Wikistorming projects have been contributing information on women and feminism to Wikipedia, bringing their voices to the larger cultural conversation about what it means to write about underrepresented topics.

  • At The New School, students have added content to a variety of articles about women and topics which had previously undeveloped articles. For example, one student is researching the Soviet filmmaker Esfir Shub. As the student writes, she “was an incredibly influential pioneering documentary filmmaker and editor in post-revolutionary Soviet Russia…Her best known film, Fall of the Romanov Dynasty, was the first Soviet documentary to employ sound. I am thrilled to a part of this course as delves into the depths of my interests. It has been an interesting experience thus far.” Another student is expanding the article on Brenda Laurel, who is, as the student explains, “known for her involvement and enthusiasm for female gaming and was the vice-president and founder of Purple Moon, a gaming company that was dedicated to creating games for young girls.”

University of Illinois Students editing Wikipedia, October 2013

  • At the University Illinois, students have made plans to improve a wide variety of articles related to women, from comedian Tig Notaro to vegetarian food writer Deborah Madison to Betty Crocker. All of these articles are in serious need of improvement and the students’ work will dramatically improve their visibility and completeness.
  • At the Claremont Colleges, students have organized a Wikipedia edit-a-thon to be held Friday December 6th in conjunction with students from Cal State Fullerton and Cal State San Luis Obispo, where they will share their expertise and editing knowledge, followed by a collegial dinner. While FemTechNet aims to show the possibilities of distributed efforts of online communities through its DOCC, it does not neglect the importance of the physical presence and rejoices in the connections that can be made in these physical spaces.

While a great deal of work was completed, there is more to do. See our lists of open tasks at WikiProject Feminism to help out!

The Eye of the Wikistorm

By Jade Ulrich, Pitzer College

On Monday, December 2, a fellow FemTechNet (FTN) intern, Susie Ferrell, and I organized an event with funding that we were awarded from the Reclaim Open Learning Contest last summer. FemTechNet is an activated network of scholars, artists, and students who work on, with, and at the borders of technology, science and feminism in a variety of fields including STS, Media and Visual Studies, Art, Women’s Queer, and Ethnic Studies. Participants in the Feminist Dialogues on Technology course at Pitzer College, along with other interested students from the Claremont Colleges community, came together for this three-part event.

PitzerWikiStormStudents

Entitled “The Eye of the Wikistorm: The Future of Feminist Technoculture Histories,” we hosted a moderated discussion between Dr. Adrianne Wadewitz (Occidental College) and Professor Jacqueline Wernimont (Scripps College), to create a dialogue on the keyword, “WikiStorm.” We filmed the hour-long discussion between our two guests. I asked them how they see traditional academic work intersecting with public intellectual labor (such as Wikipedia), and then asked them to share their recent Wikipedia-related projects. To hear their answers, you will have to watch the WikiStorm Dialogue video, which will be up on the Commons as soon as it is edited!

WikiStormScripps PitzerWikiStormStudents2

Following this filmed dialogue, those in attendance embarked on their own Wiki-a-thon. The Wikistorming project seeks to engender a set of digital practices among women and girls, to teach and encourage their participation in writing the techno-cultural histories of the future by becoming active participants in the creation of global digital archives. Experienced Wikipedians helped the new editors, and great work was done on this digital encyclopedia. At the end of the evening, we all enjoyed a delicious Thai dinner, where we socialized and talked about why we were attending the event. Many of us had similar interests, and the conversation flowed easily. In the end, FemTechNet brought together a group of passionate people, filmed a dialogue video that we can add to the FTN archive for future use, and we enjoyed each other’s company throughout an evening of Feminist Technology Networking. What more could we ask for?

online open office hours 2014-2015

DOCC 2014: September – December

Collaborations in Feminist & Technology  

Video Dialogues & Online Open Office Hours Schedule

Each week from Sept 22-Dec 1st we will feature a Video Dialogue on the FemTechNet website and host an Online Open Office Hour (OOOH) for anyone involved or interested in FemTechNet to join. The OOOH times differ from week to week, so please take note of these dates and times.

There is a Town Hall Meeting scheduled for Nov 25 on the topic of Feminist Digital Media Praxis and Safety/Risk. A second Town Hall on the topic of  International Feminist Collaborations is scheduled for Dec 15/16.

Unless otherwise stated, we will host the OOOH and Town Hall Meetings on Bluejeans. All OOOH and Town Hall links will be posted to the FemTechNet website.

Questions?

Contact the course director: T.L. Cowan, Chair, Pedagogy Committee, FemTechNet (cowant AT newschool.edu)

September 26, 2014

Wk 1: History of the Engagement of Feminism, Technology and Issues of Women’s Labor

Judy Wajcman interviewed by Anne Balsamo. See video here.

Office Hour Discussion led by: Elizabeth Losh and Melissa Gregg

Date/Time: Friday September 26 1-2PM PST (4-5PM EST)

Open Source Reading(s):

  1. “Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness, and Work-Home Divisions” by Judy Wajcman, Michael Bittman, and Judith Brown https://www.lse.ac.uk/sociology/pdf/Wajcman%20Families%20Without%20Borders.pdf
  2. “Circuits of Labor: A Labor Theory of the iPhone Era” by Jack Linchuan Qiu, Melissa Gregg, and Kate Crawford  https://www.academia.edu/7268238/Circuits_of_Labor_A_Labor_Theory_of_the_iPhone_Era
  3. “Introduction” to Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory by Trebor Scholz https://www.academia.edu/2303176/Introduction_to_Digital_Labor_The_Internet_as_Playground_and_Factory

September 30, 2014
Wk 2:  Archive

Discussion with Lynn Hershman and B. Ruby Rich moderated by Anne Balsamo. See video here.

Office Hour Discussion led by: Veronica Paredes

Date/Time: Tuesday September 30 | 4:00 pm ET/ 3:00 pm CT / 1:00 pm PT

Readings:

    1. Lynn Hershman Leeson, RAW/WAR: Revolution Art Women project | Teknolust trailer (2002) | Documentation archive of Lynn Hershman Leeson’s artwork !Women Art Revolution (2010) available to view here on Hulu (requires a login)
    2. B. Ruby Rich “In the Name of Feminist Film Criticism” Heresies, no. 9 (Vol. 3, No. 1, 1980): 74-81. (Searchable version of Rich’s piece can be found here – pw: ftn!2014
    3. Kate Eichhorn, “Archiving the Movement: The Riot Grrrl Collection at Fales Library and Special Collections.” In Documenting Feminist Activism. Eds.Kelly Wooten and Liz Bly. LA: Litwin Books, 2012.

October 7, 2014
Wk 3:  Feminism, Technology, and Wiki Storming

Discussion with Jacqueline Wernimont and Adrianne Wadewitz moderated by Jade Ulrich. See video here.

Office Hour Discussion led by: Jacqueline Wernimont

Date/Time: Tuesday, Oct 7 11-12 ET: 9-10 MT; 8-9 PT

Readings:

  1. Wadewitz, Adrianne “Looking at the five pillars of Wikipedia as a feminist” Part 1 and 2
  2. Sentiles, Sarah. “Writing Her In: Wikipedia as Feminist Activism” Ms. Blog, May 21, 2014

October 16, 2014
Wk 4:  Feminism, Technology and Sexualities

Discussion with Julie Levin Russo and Faith Wilding moderated by Anne Balsamo. See video here.

Office Hour Discussion led by: María González Aguado

Date/Time: Thursday Oct. 16th from 1-2 pm EST

Meeting link:  https://bluejeans.com/669641108

Readings:

  1. Manderson, Lenore (2012): Material Worlds, Sexy Lives, in in Manderson, Lenore: Technologies of Sexuality, Identity and Sexual Health”, Routledge. file:///Users/maria/Downloads/Material_worlds__sexy_lives-libre.pdf
  2. Traweek, Sharon (2000): “Warning Signs: Acting on Images”, in “Revisioning Women, Health, and Healing. Feminist, Cultural, and Technoscience Perspectives”, edited by A. Clark and Virginia Olesen: https://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/history/traweek/Warning.pdf
  3. Wittig, Monique: One is Not a Woman https://research.uvu.edu/albrecht-crane/2600/links_files/Wittig.pdf 

Suggested reading: Buchanan, Holly, Rei, Frank & Couch, Murray (2012): “The Re/Making of Men and Penile Modification”; in Manderson, Lenore: Technologies of Sexuality, Identity and Sexual Health”, Routledge. (Please email mariagaguadoATgmailDOTcom to get the pdf)

(For readings on the topic in Spanish, please, contact mariagaguadoATgmailDOTcom)

October 20, 2014
Wk 5:  Feminism, Technology and Race

To discuss VIDEO DIALOGUE with Lisa Nakamura and Maria Fernandez, moderated by Anne Balsamo. See video here.

Office Hour Discussion led by: Lisa Nakamura and Veronica Paredes

Date/Time: Monday October 20 | 11:00am-12:00pm ET (8:00-9:00am PT/ 10:00-11:00am CT)

Meeting link:  https://bluejeans.com/669641108

Readings:

  1. Lisa Nakamura, “Queer Female of Color: The Highest Difficulty Setting There Is? Gaming Rhetoric as Gender Capital,”  Ada: a Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, No. 1. 2012
  2. Lisa Nakamura, “Cyber-race,” PMLA: Proceedings of the Modern Language Association, Special issue on Comparative Racialization, 2008
  3. María Fernandez, “Cyberfeminism, Racism, Embodiment,” Domain Errors: Cyberfeminist Practices!, Maria Fernandez, Faith Wilding, Michelle M. Wright, eds (New York: Autonomedia 2002).

 YouTube videos:

  1. chescaleigh, “Just Stop Talking About Race!!”
  2. Jay Smooth, “How To Tell Someone They Sound Racist”
  3. Aamer Rahman (Fear of a Brown Planet) – Reverse Racism

October 28, 2014
Week 6: Bodies

Discussion featuring Alondra Nelson and Jessie Daniels with Lisa Nakamura and Sidonie Smith. See video here.

 Office Hour Discussion led by: T.L. Cowan

Date/Time: Mon Oct. 27 7-8pm ET Changed to Tuesday 3pmET

Meeting link:  https://bluejeans.com/669641108

Readings:

  1. Alondra Nelson. “The Social Life of DNA.” Chronicle of Higher Education. 29 Aug. 2010. https://chronicle.com/article/The-Social-Life-of-DNA/124138/
  2. Jessie Daniels. “Web 2.0, Healthcare Policy and Community Health Activism.” Policy and Politics for Nurses and Other Health Professionals. Eds. Donna M. Nikitas, et. al. Sudbury MA: Jones and Bartlett (2011): 277-285.  https://www.academia.edu/6820282/Case_Study_Web_2.0_Healthcare_Policy_and_Community_Health_Activism

Making Bodies

Discussion with Skawennati and Heather Cassils moderated by T.L. Cowan. See video here.

Office Hour Discussion led by: T.L. Cowan and K. Surkan

Date/Time: Tuesday Oct. 28 3-4pm ET

Meeting link:  https://bluejeans.com/669641108

Readings: 

  1. Christine L. Liao, “My Metamorphic Avatar Journey.” Visual Culture & Gender. 3 (2008). https://vcg.emitto.net/3vol/liao.pdf
  2. Henry Jenkins. “It’s 2012. Do You Know Where Your Avatar Is?”: An Interview with Beth Coleman.

Watch artist talks brought to you by FemTechNet:

 Bodies 2013 at Illinois

Discussion featuring video dialogue with Dorothy Roberts and Karen Flynn moderated by Sharon Irish.

Office Hour Discussion led by: Sharon Irish, combined with TL Cowan and K Surkan, above

Date/Time: Wed. Oct 29, 4-5pm EST

November 4, 2014

Wk 7:  Difference

Discussion with Shu Lea Cheang and Kim Sawchuk moderated by Sara DiamondSee video here.

Office Hour Discussion led by: Karen Keifer-Boyd

Date/Time: Tues. Nov. 4, 3-5 pm EST

How to join via Adobe Connect:

Participants to this OOOH will be joining Karen Keifer-Boyd’s class discussion and already should have viewed the FTN Difference video dialogue. Go to https://meeting.psu.edu/oooh_difference/ (Adobe Connect Penn State, no sign-in or download needed. Go to the URL and turn on your mic when speaking, and mute while others are speaking. The webcam will be enabled to see each other, and we’ll use screen share when we watch Dr. Ordóñez’s class recording of their response to FemTechNet’s “Difference” Video Dialogue and then back to viewing the seminar table with students in the class to discuss with all joining us. The Penn State students will be preparing their performative research videos in response to the FTN Difference video dialogue and present this on Nov. 11. There are 7 graduate students in the course, Including Difference. Refer to Nov. 4 details at https://cyberhouse.arted.psu.edu/difference/topics/11_subjectivity.html for links and other details during the OOOH discussion.

Readings:

  1. Nyman, Micki (2013). Interpretation makes it real: Disability and subjectivity in biopics of three women artists. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(4). Retrieved from https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1777/3259

Suggested Readings (students in the class will have read these on Sept. 23 for the class they watched the FTN Difference video dialogue):

November 10, 2014
Wk 8:  Place
Discussion with Radhika Gajjala and Sharon Irish moderated by Alex Juhasz. See video here.

Office Hour Discussion led by: Cricket Keating & Melissa Meade

Date/Time: Monday, Nov. 10, 12-1 pm EST

Meeting link:  https://bluejeans.com/669641108

Readings:

  1. Doreen Massey, “A Global Sense of Place,” Marxism Today 38(1991), 24-29. https://thinkurbanism.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/a-global-sense-of-place-by-doreen-massey-1991/
  2. Brenda Nyandiko Sanya, “Disrupting patriarchy: An examination of the role of e-technologies in rural Kenya.” Feminist Africa 18(2013), 12-24.

November 17 & 21, 2014
Wk 9: Systems

Discussion with Lucy Suchman and Katherine Gibson Graham moderated by Anne Balsamo. See video here.

Office Hour Discussion led by: Alex Cruse

Date/Time: Monday, Nov 17 (2:00pm EST)

Meeting link:  https://bluejeans.com/669641108

Readings: “Systems Theory and the Spirit of Feminism: Grounds for a Connection,” Barbara Hanson, pgs. 1-11, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sres.412/pdf (subject to change)

Systems: Games
Discussion with Brenda Laurel and Janet Murray moderated by Anne Balsamo. See video here.

Office Hour Discussion led by: Sandra Gabriele & Mia Consalvo

Date/Time: Friday November 21 at 13h00 (1pm EST)

Register by sending email to cowant AT newschool.edu: subject line – Games. Please write a 1 or 2-sentence description of why you want to participate.

On the date of the event, you will get an email with an invitation to join the online discussion via BlueJeans. When you first work in BlueJeans you will need to install a plugin, which happens almost automatically when you follow the invitation directions.

Readings:

  1. Consalvo, M. (2012). Confronting Toxic Gamer Culture: A Challenge for Feminist Game Studies Scholars. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, No. 1. https://adanewmedia.org/2012/11/issue1-consalvo/
  2. “Television Interview about Harassment in Gaming.” Feminist Frequency. November 3, 2012. https://www.feministfrequency.com/2012/11/television-interview-about-harassment-in-gaming/ 

Suggested Readings:

November 24, 2014
Wk 10:  Performance has been CANCELLED; stay tuned for early 2015

Bilingual (Spanish & English) discussion with Maris Bustamante and Sara Diamond, moderated by Maria-Belén Ordóñez and Paula Gardner. (Video link TBA)

Office Hour Discussion led by: Maria-Belén Ordóñez

Date/Time: Monday, Nov 24 10:30-11:30 a.m (EST)

Readings:

  1. Anzaldua, Gloria “La Conciencia de la Mestiza: Towards a New Consciousness”  in Borderlands La Frontera: The New Mestiza San Francisco: AuteLute Books, 1999. https://faculty.oxy.edu/ron/msi/05/texts/anzaldua-mestizaconsciousness.pdf
  2. Frieze: No-Grupo https://www.frieze.com/issue/review/no-grupo/

December 1, 2014
Wk 11:  Transformations

Discussion about the work of Beatriz da Costa featuring Donna Haraway and Catherine Lord moderated by Alex Juhasz. See video here.

Transformations, pt II

Part II features the live question and answer session following the presentations from Donna Haraway and Catherine Lord about Beatriz da Costa’s work, moderated by Alex Juhasz.

Office Hours for both videos led by: Alexandra Juhasz

Date/Time: Monday, December 1, 1PM PST

Meeting link:  https://bluejeans.com/669641108

Readings: https://scalar.usc.edu/anvc/feminist-anti-mooc/instructions

The link above is an interactive reader that is available free online and is comprised of these three readings:

  1. Donna Haraway, “Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century,” in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York; Routledge, 1991), pp.149-181.
  2. Beatriz da Costa,  “Reaching the Limit When Art Becomes Science,” in Tactical Biopolitics: Art, Activism, and Technoscience, eds. da Costa and Kavita Phillips (MIT Press, 2010).
  3. Catherine Lord, Summer of Her Baldness, (University of TX Press, 2004).

 

key learning projects

Since the launch of Distributed Open Collaborative Courses in 2013, many FemTechNet participants have developed Key Learning Projects in collaboration across the network. New activities are in development too, but you may check out those that have been developed so far:

What is a Key Learning Project? Our intention is that these projects will have the most support from the FemTechNet Pedagogy Committee, and therefore will be easiest to access and easiest to collaborate around across nodal sites. Like everything in the DOCC 2013, these are buy-in: instructors will use them in their courses if and as best suits their students and learning objectives.

For examples of student projects in response to these and other assignments during the Beta classes and DOCC 2013, please see the Student Projects Gallery.

What about other Projects/Assignments? Any instructor can assign her/his/their own projects at any time.

Examples of Other Projects/Assignments

Annotated Readers: In the Spring 2013 Beta class, undergrad students at Pitzer and grad students in a digital pedagogies seminar at USC participated in two collaborative projects where the grad students produced annotated digital readers for undergrads, around the course themes Transformation (reading by Haraway, Lord, and da Costa) and Race (readings by Nakamura and Fernandez), using two authoring tools, Comment Press and Scalar.

Making: AJ Strout, Pitzer Beta Class, created a detailed record and a blog of the many in-class, hands-on “making” exercises that Pitzer students participated in during the Spring of 2013.

Conference: UCFemTechNet Conference, with UCSD (and other UC) grad student volunteers and day of panels and workshops: https://feministit.ucsd.edu/

Tribute to Adrianne Wadewitz

Written by Alex Juhasz and Anne Balsamo

It is with grief and shock that FemTechNet marks the untimely death of our remarkable collaborator and colleague, Dr. Adrianne Wadewitz. Within our community of feminist scholars, artists and activists, she was a leader, innovator, and expert. Her work for FemTechNet, collaborating with other instructors and students on our Wikistorming Committee, had deep impact for our community, and will have lasting effect as feminists around the world continue to follow her lead as they add feminist voices, influences, histories, and theories into Wikipedia.

(more…)

video dialogues

A conference at Brown University that launched the video dialogues. L to R, back row: Kara Keeling, Wendy Chun, Faith Wilding; L to R, front row: Maria Fernandez, Anne Balsamo, Lisa Nakamura

A conference at Brown University that launched the video dialogues.
L to R, back row: Kara Keeling, Wendy Chun, Faith Wilding; L to R, front row: Maria Fernandez, Anne Balsamo, Lisa Nakamura

Dialogue and interchange are key aspects of FemTechNet. During 2012-2013, we produced at least four dialogues, on Labor, Race, Sexualities, and Machine. The Dialogues are on the FemTechNet Vimeo channel as well as hosted on a site that enables captions with transcripts, here. Other topics include: Archive, Wikistorming, Bodies, Difference, Place, Systems, Transformations, and Games.

Each Video Dialogue features two prominent feminist scholars/artists/practitioners in conversation about a topic.  The topics for the Video Dialogues were “community-sourced” based on discussions among FemTechNet participants in July-Sept 2012.

Topics discussed in each Video Dialogue are intentionally broad and should be understood as a starting point for further discussion among DOCC participants.

 

Ready for filming the video dialogue on Bodies at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. L to R: Dorothy Roberts, Karen Flynn, and Sharon Irish

Ready for filming the video dialogue on Bodies at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. L to R: Dorothy Roberts, Karen Flynn, and Sharon Irish

2013-2014

DOCC 2013: Dialogues on Feminism and Technology

In 2013, FemTechNet initiated a networked learning experiment involving instructors and students from several institutions in the creation of a collaborative open course structure called a DOCC:  Distributed Open Collaborative Course on the topic of Dialogues on Feminism and Technology.

The first iteration of the DOCC 2013 took place from September-December, 2013. Ideas for DOCC courses to interact are listed here, with instructions. 

Feminism and feminists have been integral to technology innovation, yet as recently as June 2012, the New York Times carried an article about Silicon Valley that opened with the line:  “Men invented the Internet.”  As technology remakes academia and the arts, critical analysis of gender, sexualities, and race have been absent in much of this re-thinking of disciplines and practices. Since the early years of Internet availability, cyberfeminists have explored the use of the Internet for dialogue and participation across various socio-economic layers worldwide. Access and skills for women and various economically underprivileged communities of the world (such as populations from the developing world and inner cities of the U.S.) were central concerns for feminists in developing distributed and participatory environments for learning, training and information exchange.

Since the mid 1990s, cyberfeminists have spent significant time and energy in developing methods for inclusive teaching. The DOCC 2013 has been created as an alternative genre of MOOC, to demonstrate the innovative process of feminist thinking that engages issues of networked infrastructures for learning, learner-centered pedagogies, collaborative knowledge creation, and transformational practices of design and media making.

A MOOC (massive open online course) is typically organized and branded by a single (elite) institution. A DOCC recognizes and is built on the understanding that expertise is distributed throughout a network, among participants situated in diverse institutional contexts, within diverse material, geographic, and national settings, and who embody and perform diverse identities (as teachers, as students, as media-makers, as activists, as trainers, as members of various publics, for example).

The organization of a DOCC addresses the collaborative nature of learning in a digital age.  A DOCC is an alternative genre of MOOC.  A MOOC (massive open online course) is pedagogically centralized and branded by a single institution. The fundamental difference is that a DOCC recognizes and is built on the understanding that expertise is distributed throughout a network, among participants situated in diverse institutional contexts, within diverse material, geographic, and national settings, and who embody and perform diverse identities (as teachers, as students, as media-makers, as activists, as trainers, as members of various publics, for example). The organization of a DOCC addresses the collaborative nature of learning in a digital age. The DOCC2013 engages participants (from North America in this version) to teach NODAL courses, each of which is configured within a particular educational institutional setting. There is no single credit granting institution. Credit is offered to students through mechanisms that are already established within particular/situated institutions.

Instructors at fifteen universities and colleges participated in the DOCC 2013.  Each instructor of a NODAL course created a course that suited her or his students, institution, locale, and discipline. FemTechNet delivered ten weeks of course content covering both the historical and cutting edge scholarship on technology produced through art, science, and visual studies.  The core content consisted of 10 Video Dialogues that feature discussions among prominent and innovative thinkers and artists who address the question of technology through feminist frameworks.  Course content grew through the exchange among participants. Dialogues on Feminism and Technology used technology to enable interdisciplinary and international conversation while privileging situated diversity and networked agency.

FemTechNet facilitated a shared pedagogical activity called Storming Wikipedia designed to write women and feminist scholarship of science and technology back into our web-based cultural archives. By engaging in the practices of editing and revising Wikipedia pages, participants address the gendered division of labor of online encyclopedia authoring and editing which is skewed now toward male participation. Through the Storming Wikipedia activities we also seek to engage a wider group of participants in the effort of writing and maintaining a digital archive of feminist work in science, technology and media so that the histories of the future will be well populated by the ideas and people who took feminism seriously as a source of inspiration and innovation in the creation of new technocultures.

Because FemTechNet is a network, we refer to our convenings–whether institutional or community-based–as nodes. Below  are the locations of the 2013-14 nodes.

nodes

Alternative Venues

  • Sharon Collingwood, Minerva OSU
  • Course Title: Dialogues on Feminism and Technology, in Second Life
  • Number of Students: TBD
  • Level: All levels
  • Working Committees: Accessibility
  • Stephanie Rosen, Northampton, MA
  • Course Title: Mass FemTechNet
  • Number of Students: TBD
  • Levels: Adult
  • Working Committees: Accessibility

Bowling Green State University

  • Radhika Gajjala
  • Course Title: Feminism and Technology (Fully Online Course)
  • Number of Students: 15
  • Level: Undergraduate
  • Working Committees: WikiStorming, Video, Steering

Brown University

California Polytechnic State University

  • Jane Lehr and Sandi Clement
  • Course Title: Gender, Race, Science and Technology
  • Number of Students: 32-40
  • Level: 300-level/ Junior
  • Working Committees: Pedagogy, Commons, Assessment
  • Jane Lehr and Michael Haungs
  • Course Title: Project-Based Learning in Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies
  • Number of Students: 15-20
  • Level: 300-level/Junior
  • Working Committees: Pedagogy, Commons, Assessment

California State University, Fullerton

  • Karyl Ketchum
  • Course Title: Gender and Technoculture
  • Number of Students: 35 in each of two sections
  • Level: Undergraduate
  • Working Committees: Communications

Colby-Sawyer College

  • Melissa Meade
  • Course Title: Gender and Technoculture
  • Number of Students: 8
  • Level: Undergraduate
  • Working Committees: WikiStorming, White Paper

The Graduate Center, CUNY

  • Kathlene McDonald
  • Course Title: Feminism and Technology
  • Number of Students: 8
  • Level: Offered in Women’s Studies Doctoral Certificate Program
  • Working Committees: Archive, Assessment, Steering

Macaulay Honors College, CUNY

  • Lisa Brundage
  • Course Title: Imagining Gender: Exploring Narratives of Technology
  • Number of Students: TBD
  • Level: Undergraduate
  • Working Committees: Pedagogy, Commons

Ohio State University

Ontario College of Art and Design University

  • Maria-Belen Ordonez
  • Course Title: Dialogues on Feminism and Technology
  • Number of Students: 9
  • Level: Graduate
  • Support from: Caroline Langill and Paula Gardner
  • Working Committees: MBO: Communication; PG: Communications, Video

Pennsylvania State University

  • Karen Keifer-Boyd (lead) with Jennifer Wagner-Lawler and Eileen Trauth
  • Course Title: Gender, Art & STEM
  • Number of Students: 6
  • Level:  Graduate
  • Working Committees:  KKB: Pedagogy

Pitzer College

Rutgers University

  • Karen Alexander and Elaine Zundl
  • Course Title: Gender Race and Techno-culture
  • Number of Students: 2 (taught as independent study)
  • Level: TBD
  • Working Committees: KA: Pedagogy; EZ: Pedagogy, Assessment, WikiStorming

The New School

  • Anne Balsamo and Veronica Paredes
  • Course Title: Dialogues on Feminism and Technology
  • Number of Students: 17
  • Level: Undergraduate
  • Working Committees: AB: Commons, Video, Steering; VP: Commons, Archive, Video, Student

University of California, San Diego 

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

  • Sharon Irish, Sharra Vostral and CL Cole
  • Course Title: Dialogues on Feminism and Technology
  • Number of Students: 18
  • Level: Graduate
  • Working Committees: SI: Communication, Archive, Steering; CLC: White Paper
  • CL Cole
  • Course Title: Digital and Gendered Cultures
  • Number of Students: 24
  • Level: Undergraduate

Yale University